Comparison of the contact ureterolithotripsy methods in treatment of ureterolithiasis

Keywords: calculi of ureter; ultrasound contact ureterolithotripsy; laser contact ureterolithotripsy

Abstract

Objective. Comparative analysis of results of the ultrasound and laser contact ureterolithotripsy in treatment of «сomplex» ureteric calculi.

Маterials and methods. In 257 patients, suffering «сomplex» calculi a contant lithotripsy was conducted, using ultrasound lithotriptor, and in 265 patients – a laser one.

Conclusion. Application of laser contact ureterolithotripsy promotes improvement of the treatment results in «сomplex» ureteric calculi, and reduction of the іntra– and postoperative morbidity rate.

Author Biographies

V. М. Lesovyi, Kharkiv National Medical University

Lesovoy Volodymyr - Doctor of medical sciences, professor, head of the chair department Kharkiv national medical university Department of urology, nephrology and andrology Nauky Ave., 4, Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine
tel.: 738-71-55
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2722-419X

R. V. Stetsyshyn, Kharkiv Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Regional Clinical Centre of Urology and Nephrology named after V. І. Shapoval, Kharkiv

Stetsyshyn Roman
Doctor of medical science, professor of the department Kharkiv medical academy of postgraduate education Department of general, child’s and oncological urology; Head of department of general urology No 4, MIH “Regional Clinical Center of Urology and Nephrology n.a. V.I. Shapoval” Moskovskiy avenue 195, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61037.
Е-mail: r.stestyshyn@gmail.com
tel.: 738-72-39
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5631-3274

D. V. Shchukin, Kharkiv National Medical University, Regional Clinical Centre of Urology and Nephrology named after V. І. Shapoval, Kharkiv

Dmitriy Shchukin
Doctor of medical science, professor of the department Kharkiv national medical university Department of urology, nephrology and andrology; Head of department of general urology No 1, MIH “Regional Clinical Center of Urology and Nephrology n.a. V.I. Shapoval” Moskovskiy avenue 195, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61037
tel.: 738-71-33
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2335-6101

References

1. Borzhiеvskiy ATs, Vozіanov SO. Ureterolitiaz (urologichni aspekti). In-t urologiyi AMN Ukrayini. 2007, 263 s. [ In Ukranian]
2. Hubner WA, Irby P, Stoller ML. Natural history and current concepts for the treatment of small ureteral calculi. Eur Urol. 2013;24:172. PMID: 8375436.
3. Miller OF, Kane CJ. Time to stone passage for observed ureteral calculi: a guide for patient education. J Urol. 1999 Sep;162(3 Pt 1):688-90; discussion 690-1. PMID: 10458343.
4. Morgentaler A, Bridge SS, Dretler SP. Management of the impacted ureteral calculus. J Urol. 1990 Feb;143(2):263-6. PMID: 1967657.
5. Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG, Alken P, Buck AC, Gallucci M, et al. 2007 Guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. Eur Urol. 2007 Dec;52(6):1610-31. PMID: 18074433.
6. Kaprin AD, Ivanenko KV, Ivanov SA. Kontaktnaya ureterolitotripsiya golmievyim lazerom “Medilas H” firmyi “Dornier”. Urologiya. 2013;5:43-5. [In Russian]
7. Coll DM, Varanelli MJ, Smith RC. Relationship of spontaneous passage of ureteral calculi to stone size and location as revealed by unenhanced helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Jan;178(1):101-3. doi: 10.2214/ajr.178.1.1780101.
8. Glyibochko PV, Alyaev YuG, Rapoport LM. Oslozhneniya kontaktnoy ureterolitotripsii. Saratovskiy nauchno-meditsinskiy zhurnal. 2011;2(7):139. [In Russian]
Published
2018-07-26
How to Cite
LesovyiV. М., Stetsyshyn, R. V., & Shchukin, D. V. (2018). Comparison of the contact ureterolithotripsy methods in treatment of ureterolithiasis. Klinicheskaia Khirurgiia, 85(7), 71-74. https://doi.org/10.26779/2522-1396.2018.07.71
Section
General Problems of Surgery